Mackenmurphy argues that physique > height.

Member
TheDestroyer
Short Lord
Height: 5'8
Location: The Bronx, United States
Joined: Apr 06, 2014
Posts: 84
Reactions: 6
Score: 5 | 2
KingCash: 35

Offline

Dating
Mackenmurphy argues that physique > height.
post #1

I don't entirely disagree with what he's saying, but without a doubt, height plays a significant factor. The fact of the matter is, many or most women would choose a 6ft skinny guy over a 5'7 guy like myself who is jacked.

There are women however who would value an in shape guy much more that's within reasonable range of her height preference. If she has a strong 5'10 preference, and she's say, 5'2 she might let 5'8 or even 5'6 guy slide if he is what they like to say "top-tier"

Member
MyFairLady
Short Damsel
Height: 5'2
Location: New York, United States
Joined: May 27, 2024
Posts: 21
Reactions: 7
Score: 5 | 0
KingCash: 33

Offline

Re: Mackenmurphy argues that physique > height.
post #2

I've always preferred a nice physique and it has made men more appealing than just being tall. As you said, it's within reason. 

Most of my friends who perfer men who are tall when vocalizing their "ideal" have crushed on plenty of shorter guys. A nice physique has always been a plus. 

Member
CorporateGuy
Short Knight
Height: 5'6
Location: Brooklyn, United States
Joined: Apr 16, 2014
Posts: 102
Reactions: 50
Score: 7 | 0
KingCash: 61

Offline

Re: Mackenmurphy argues that physique > height.
post #3

Being fit helps, but doesn't mask. Full stop.