Member Profiles: ahimsa42
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
- Forum »
- Community »
- Member Profiles »
- ahimsa42
Recent Posts From ahimsa42
it all depends on how short & how facially attractive a man is. there are women who would take a great looking 5'8 man over an average 6' guy & i have even seen men of my height (5'6) who are so good looking that they are able to get very attractive GF's. a 5'6 chadlet is of course going to have far fewer options than a 5'10+ chad but he will also have more options than an average at best 5'10 guy.
anything under 5'6 is going to be exceptionally difficult regardless of how good looking he is though. in the US, at around 5'10 a mans height becomes a neutral attraction factor for many women with anything below that being a negative & anything above it a positive. it's only when a man has all 3 cardinal genetic detriments of being short, bald & facially unfortunate that romantic love is entirely out of the question for him.
she is virtue signaling for clicks and is basically saying if a women is not good enough to attract the men she is truly interested in she should settle for "lesser" men. the reality is that the vast majority of women will choose to be alone or share a chad instead of being in a relationship with an "inferior" man.
it shows a huge lack of awareness that a 5'3 guy would even consider using a dating app. unless the man is extremely facially gifted, any man who's height is under 5'9 is going to be immediately filtered out by 99.9% of women.
women get extremely offended when an average at best or below man shows her interest because they consider it a reflection of their own level of (un)attractiveness as female attraction is ALL about a mans genetic quality in regards to his inherent physical attributes. this is why the red pill philosophy is so fallacious because it is impossible to make up for a lack of physical qualities with non-physical factors.